#STORYBOARD QUICK 6.1 REVIEWS PORTABLE#

If users need to work out whether a link is a hyperlink it adds to cognitive workload, which distracts attention. Indications of links that are clickable: even though designers might think that colored links are clickable, it is not always obvious. Interactive exercises and if they appear initially or at what point in the sequence. Placement of call-out buttons and if they appear initially or at what point in the sequence. Graphics placement and sizes, and if they appear initially or at what point in the sequence. The placement of text on the page (being consistent throughout) and if it appears initially or at what point in the sequence. This also helps with cognitive load as segmenting/chunking items together helps pre-process the page so the mind doesn’t have to organize it. Organize similar items logically (or nested underneath the header in a section of the page). Place larger fonts, and bolder, different colors in the middle near the top. The more important something is the more prominent it should be. Students tend to notice text that is large and bold. ■įont type, size, and color to be used for various headings, subheadings, and text. −ĭecide where the navigation elements, choices, or questions will be placed (at the top, bottom, side?) and be consistent. Create a theme so that users become familiar with what to expect (table of contents always on the left?). −īe consistent with rules and carry them from one page to the next. The location of the various types of navigation, index, etc. Minimize noise: are there contrasts between sections is there too much text or business? Determine what information is critical for each page and what information can be put on a second level, perhaps with an indicator to “click here for more information or examples.” ■ −ĭecide where the main content or image will be (in the middle with call-outs on the right side?). Each one might include details such as: ■īreak up pages into clearly defined areas this allows students to decide which areas to focus on and which to ignore. These alternatives will undergo an iterative design cycle based on heuristics evaluations until they are finally approved by the surgeons.įor a screencasting learning object or for a video several storyboards will be needed to depict various sequences.

Finally, a number of alternative interface designs will be simulated for each task. These specifications will be based on combining the user requirements and the inputs from the technology partners on the system specifications. The user interface and design specifications can be drawn up after selecting the key technological approach, based on the storyboards. User interface and design specifications.

#STORYBOARD QUICK 6.1 REVIEWS PORTABLE#

For example, if computerised tomography is selected as the imaging modality to assist the clinician in the current procedure, the workflow will change, as this requires either the patient to be taken to and from a CT room or a portable CT machine to be brought into the operating theatre/intervention room. The advantage of storyboards is that they show the sequence of actions on a time scale, making it easier for surgeons and technologists to select the solution with the maximum potential in future.

These will be subjected to a technological evaluation cycle with the surgeons and the technologists. Based on the user requirements, a number of optional storyboards representing scenarios of technological possibilities will be created using an adaptation of storyboard technique (a technique for projecting future scenarios of product usage graphically). The visualisation support provided by the new medical system may change the current surgical workflow, so we need to speculate on possible changes in the surgical workflow.

Storyboard quick 6.1 reviews